COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

CAICA NEWS

Federal report paints grim picture of restraint techniques in schools

May 19, 2009 (updated May 20, 2009)
By John Simerman
Contra Costa Times


A 230-pound Texas teacher forces a boy face down and lays on top of him, killing him, after he refused to stay seated in class.

Weeks after threatening suicide, a 13-year-old boy with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder hangs himself in a seclusion room using a cord a teacher reportedly gave him to hold up his pants.

An assistant principal and staff at a Michigan public school failed to offer medical help for an autistic student's seizure, instead placing him in a prone restraint for an hour. He died, but no criminal charges were filed. The assistant principal now heads another school in the district.

They are among hundreds of confirmed cases and allegations that the Government Accountability Office unearthed in a report Tuesday that paints a grim picture of how school officials have misused techniques to restrain or seclude disruptive students — most of them with disabilities.

The GAO also found that states vary widely in their regulation of the techniques in schools; that criminal sanctions are rare; and frequently teachers or administrators who abused or even killed children remain in school posts, despite expensive civil judgments against the districts.

The report came at the request of the House Education and Labor Committee, which heard testimony Tuesday from parents of abused children, schools officials and experts as it weighs federal legislation for training, reporting and possibly limiting uses of restraint or seclusion. Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, the committee chairman, said just two states — California and Texas — require reporting of restraint or seclusion, and that those two states alone report 30,000 incidents.

What's alarming from the report, is "the number of children who have died when people have put them in restraints, what they call prone restraint, face down on the floor and having someone sit on them, being suffocated. Hundreds and hundreds of kids put in abusive situations, dangerous situations," Miller said. "This is a very serious problem."

Child advocates and lawyers for disabled students say the problem has grown as the number of cases of autism and other disabilities grows and more special education students enter traditional public schools. In January, the National Disability Rights Network issued a report documenting "dozens of cases of students abusively pinned to the floor for hours at a time, handcuffed, locked in closets, and subjected to other traumatizing acts of violence," the GAO report states.

Rhoda Benedetti, a Walnut Creek-based lawyer for disabled children, blames school districts that cut corners in crafting state-mandated support plans for special education students, then resorting to harsh discipline when the plan fails.

"I've had clients who were seven years old placed in closets, or their arms pinned down, where they restrain them on the ground and sit on them. I've had clients with severe bruising, black eyes occurring at schools and the schools having no explanation for it," she said. "And the authorities tend to look the other way. If a parent inflicted these kinds of damaging injuries to a disabled child, the parent would be investigated of course. But when a school does it, nobody does a thing."

According to the GAO report, 19 states have no laws or regulations related to the use of seclusion or restraint in schools. Seven place some restrictions on use of restraints but do not regulate seclusions. California sets limits on emergency interventions for special education students. Parents must be notified within a day and the school must file a report. Also, no technique can be used that is "designed or likely to cause physical pain" or denies sleep, food, water or bathroom access to the student. The student cannot be locked in seclusion.

Last year, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have tightly restricted use of restraint in schools and phased out seclusion by 2012, arguing that the bill could place more students at risk by tying the hands of school employees. Bruce Hunter of the American Association of School Administrators cautioned that outlawing such techniques outright could endanger students and teachers.

"If that were to happen and there were a dangerous situation where somebody was being attacked, we would have to call the cops and sit there and wait," said Hunter. "That's unreasonable."

Reach John Simerman at 925-943-8072 or jsimerman@bayareanewsgroup.com.

 

TROUBLED TEENS - TEEN ABUSE - HELP FOR TEENS - GAO - HELP YOUR TEEN - STRUGGLING TEENS
STRUGGLING TEEN - TEEN DATING - ADD ADHD - RESTRAINTS - CHILD ABUSE - PARENTS

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010