COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Father sues over face-down restraint of autistic boy

June 18, 2008
By Annie Burris


HUNTINGTON BEACH The father of an 8-year-old autistic child has filed suit against the Ocean View School District, two teachers and the city, claiming that a restraint technique used on the boy resulted in emotional and physical damage.

Robert Velasquez alleges negligence, civil rights violations and false imprisonment in the suit, filed in Orange County Superior Court. He also claims the teachers did not have the proper training to use the "prone restraint'' on his son in the Sept. 6 incident.

Former Lake View Elementary School teacher Gina Messig and assistant teacher Mai Vo used a prone restraint to control the boy, a special education student, when he started throwing objects in the classroom and hitting teachers, a school report said.

Velasquez said his child had scratches, bruises and a broken nose after the incident.

District officials said all of the special education teachers are trained adequately for their jobs. They declined to comment on the lawsuit. Messig and Vo could not be reached for comment. City officials said they anticipate being dismissed from the case.

Velasquez said his son has been agitated and had trouble sleeping because of nightmares since the incident.

"He is never going to be my baby like he was," he said. "No child deserves prone restraint."

Prone restraint – which means the person is held face down – is rarely used and is usually the last resort to control a child, experts say.

According to a report by Messig, the boy, then 7, was running in his classroom, trying to escape out the door and attempting to knock over a wheelchair. The boy then grabbed a girl by the hair and pulled her to the ground, Messig wrote.

The teachers tried to calm the boy and eventually dismissed the rest of the children from the classroom to play outside, the report said.

The two teachers held the child's leg and arm while he was face down on the floor, the school report said.

Velasquez said his son continues to go to Lake View but works with a new teacher. He said he has been trying to get his son transferred to the Speech and Language Development Center in Buena Park and is waiting to hear back from the school on whether the switch is approved.

He is asking for least $25,000, according to the suit filed last month. Velasquez also told The Register he would like to see cameras put in special education classes to prevent similar situations.

A bill proposed by state Senator Sheila Kuehl from Los Angeles and Ventura counties that limits physical restraint techniques is set to go before a committee on Wednesday. The bill would require teachers to "avoid the deliberate use of prone restraint techniques whenever possible.''

Contact the writer: aburris@ocregister.com

 

TROUBLED TEENS - TEEN ABUSE - HELP FOR TEENS - GAO - HELP YOUR TEEN - STRUGGLING TEENS
STRUGGLING TEEN - TEEN DATING - ADD ADHD - RESTRAINTS - CHILD ABUSE - PARENTS

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008