COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

 

Krystal Tibbetts



Killed as a result of Attachment Therapy
July 7, 1995
3 years old
 


Articles:

Victim of Attachment Therapy Midvale, Utah

Man Seeks Ban on Therapy He Used on Daughter


Victim of Attachment Therapy Midvale, Utah

By Jeremy Harmon, Deseret News

Donald Lee Tibbets in 2002 Despite
his professional training as a registered
nurse, he did not notice that his
adopted daughter had stopped
breathing while he was performing
a commonly used AT technique in
1995. He subsequently served a
full 5-year prison term for her death.

“It makes me sick to my stomach to even think that I did this,” Donald Tibbets, a former registered nurse, told the Salt Lake Tribune.

What Tibbets did was what he says he and his wife had been taught to do — performing as “co-therapists” — by Attachment Therapy (AT) practitioner Lawrence VanBloem and the Family Attachment Center (later to become the Cascade Center) in Orem, Utah. He was taught to lie across his 3-year-old adopted daughter, Krystal — who weighed only 35 pounds — in what is known in AT circles as “compression therapy,” and to push his fist into her abdomen, which is one technique of “visceral manipulation” (VM). Both VanBloem and Tibbets’s ex-wife have denied his allegations, according to court records.

On 7 July 1995, Krystal defied Tibbets, so he laid her down in the hallway of the family’s Midvale, Utah, home. According to transcripts, Tibbets pushed his fist into the girl’s stomach for 15 minutes. During the session, Krystal vomited before she stopped breathing. She died the next day in a hospital.

In prior VM sessions, Tibbets told the Deseret News, Krystal would scream, lose bowel and bladder control, and even vomit. Tibbets said he wrongly believed that she had “shut down” when she stopped screaming. “By the time I realized she was in trouble, it was too late,” he said in an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune.

A medical examiner concluded that Krystal died from suffocation and had blunt force trauma to her abdomen. The death cost Tibbets his marriage, his family, his profession, and his freedom for a time.

AT advocates claim that Tibbets is a man just trying to shift the blame for his misdeeds. Tibbets, who already has served the full 5-year sentence he was given, denies that. “I’ll always have pain. I still go though a lot of pain,” Tibbets told the News, adding that the guilt he went through in prison was immense. He told a legislative committee shortly after being released from prison that he accepts his errors and guilt for what he did to Krystal. He says he seeks now to assure that others, especially those seeking to escape responsibility, will not do things that lead to another death.

“I blame the therapist for continuing to be irresponsible in teaching this [AT], knowing what happened to Krystal and now [that] it’s happened to somebody else,” Tibbets added.


Man Seeks Ban on Therapy He Used on Daughter
The Salt Lake Tribune
Date: 09/29/2002

Man Seeks Ban on Therapy He Used on Daughter
BY JACOB SANTINI THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE

Only weeks after his release from prison last winter, Donald Tibbets appeared before the state Legislature to urge lawmakers to ban coercive holding therapy -- the technique he was using on his adopted daughter when she died. Time ran out before the proposal got an airing. So the former Midvale resident, who served 5 years in prison for his 3-year-old daughter Krystal Ann's death, will be back before lawmakers this winter to lobby for some of the toughest restrictions on coercive therapy techniques in the nation.

"It makes me sick to my stomach to even think that I did this," said Tibbets, a former registered nurse.

Once known as rage reduction therapy, the technique in general consists of holding a child down as fingers, fists or elbows are pushed into the abdomen to get the child to vent suppressed rage. It is an outdated, though not illegal, treatment for children diagnosed with attachment disorder. There are no regulated standards or certification that guide therapists using the technique.

"I knew it was controversial," Tibbets said in a telephone interview from his Cheyenne, Wyo., home. "I didn't know it would cause a death."

Coercive therapy has come under renewed scrutiny following the recent death of a 4-year-old Springville girl. Investigators allege that Cassandra Killpack died June 10 after her adoptive parents forced her to drink a fatal amount of water; her hands allegedly had been tied behind her back during the incident.

The Killpacks, charged with child abuse homicide and child abuse, claim they were acting as directed by therapist Larry VanBloem, director of the Cascade Center for Family Growth in Orem -- an allegation VanBloem denies. The therapist also treated Krystal Tibbets.

In a subsequent but separate investigation from the Killpack case, VanBloem and colleague Jennie Murdock Gwilliam acknowledged to the Department of Occupational and Professional Licensing that they used "compression holding therapy" and "deep tissue massage" on some child clients.

The department filed a 14-count licensing complaint accusing the two of ethical and professional violations, including physically and mentally abusing clients, gross incompetence and unprofessional conduct. The two social workers have maintained they are the targets of a witch hunt in which the division misrepresented innocuous client reports.
Rep. Mike Thompson, R-Orem, sponsor of last year's bill, says the new version of his "coercive restraint therapy" legislation would prohibit licensed therapists from performing or suggesting any type of coercive restraint techniques on children.

The bill would result in a ban on compression holding, rage reduction and rebirthing therapies.

"What this is talking about is child abuse," said Thompson, whose bill already has been endorsed by the Child Welfare Oversight Panel.

Thompson's proposal expands licensing repercussions, but does not include criminal penalties since existing child abuse laws would apply. The Department of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL) says the bill would strengthen its ability to go after the licenses of abusive therapists, Thompson said.

A review of action in recent years by DOPL found at least one therapist in the state who has been disciplined for, among other things, using an abusive form of holding therapy.

Therapy administered by Craig Ramsey, a marriage and family therapist, between 1993 and January 2001, involved "restraining clients and administering verbal and physical abuse," according to licensing records. Ramsey's license was placed on probation for five years in January, precluding him from providing "counseling, psychotherapy, or any form of treatment."

In an interview, VanBloem acknowledged that the Cascade center is practicing therapies that probably would violate Thompson's proposal. But, he contends, none of the practices causes pain or restricts a child's breathing or other functions. Sometimes children are restrained to prevent them from hurting themselves or others, he said.

VanBloem declined to detail therapies used or discontinued at his center, saying only that the industry has refined treatment for the reactive attachment disorder over the years.

"We have become milder and milder in our approach in therapy as we've found alternatives that are just as effective," he said.

Tibbets says VanBloem taught him to lie across Krystal, who weighed 35 pounds, and to push his fist into her abdomen -- a contention VanBloem as well as Tibbets' ex-wife denies, according to court records.

Tibbets said on July 7, 1995, Krystal defied him, so he laid her down in the hallway of the family's Midvale home. According to transcripts from his parole hearing, Tibbets pushed his fist into the girl's stomach for 15 minutes. During the session, Krystal vomited before she stopped breathing. She died the next day in a hospital.

In prior treatments, Tibbets said, Krystal would "shut down" and stop reacting to the pressure. Tibbets said he believed that is what she had done when she stopped screaming. "By the time I realized she was in trouble it was too late," he said.

A medical examiner concluded that Krystal died from suffocation and had blunt force trauma to her abdomen.
Elsewhere, the Colorado Legislature unanimously banned rebirthing therapy following the death of Candace Newmaker, 10, of North Carolina, who had been brought by her mother to the state for treatment in 2000. The two therapists who treated her are serving 16-year prison sentences.

Steven Jensen, the lead prosecutor in the Newmaker case, is running for a seat in the Colorado Senate. If elected, he said he plans to pursue a bill requiring therapists to videotape treatment sessions with children.

The new push for stricter regulations in Utah has some worried that if the practices are outlawed, coercive restraint therapies will simply move underground. "These treatments are being done in the dark corners of the mental health system," Christopher Barden, a North Salt Lake psychologist and attorney who testified in the Newmaker case, told a Utah legislative panel earlier this month.

Ronald Federici, a Washington, D.C.-based developmental neuropsychologist who specializes in treating post-institutionalized children, says that lax licensing standards allow therapists to conduct treatments for which they have no formal training or qualifications.

Thompson knows his bill will be opposed by some national groups and families who support holding therapies that don't include inflicting pain on children -- but he is confident the measure will be approved.

Opposition already is forming.

" Who defines what coercive is?" asked Charly Risenmay, the president of Utah-based Safe Adoptive Families for Children at Risk Emotionally (SAFFCARE) and opponent of Thompson's first bill. "Who defines what restraint is?"
While Thompson's bill says "coercive restraint does not include briefly holding, without undue force, a patient in order to calm a patient," Risenmay said she fears that the proposal would prohibit parents from simply hugging or cuddling a child while in therapy.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008