COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

BOOT-CAMP DEATH : Trial has making of epic battle

The case against seven boot camp guards and a nurse in the death of a teen will be tough for prosecutors, who can expect the jury to be skeptical of charges against the officers.

December 3, 2006
BY CAROL MARBIN MILLER
cmarbin@MiamiHerald.com

Bay County's classic revival courthouse rises like a sentinel from Panama City's sleepy downtown, all grand white columns and faded yellow brick. Over the years, it has been the site of some of the state's, and the nation's, epic legal battles.

Among them was Clarence Gideon's 1963 fight for a lawyer he could not afford -- a case that led the U.S. Supreme Court to declare that access to a defense lawyer is an absolute right -- and the struggles of Freddie Pitts and Wilbert Lee, two Death Row inmates, to be cleared of wrongful convictions in the murder of a Panhandle gas station attendant.

Now, once again, the Bay County Courthouse will host a legal drama that could help shape the future of Florida. Tinged with racial overtones and the clash of cultures as new Florida meets old, the trial of seven boot camp guards and a nurse in the death of 14-year-old Martin Lee Anderson will be watched throughout the nation.

''I think this is going to be a very, very explosive trial,'' said Benjamin Crump, a Tallahassee lawyer who represents the dead teen's parents, Robert Anderson and Gina Jones.

The outcome of the case is far from clear, though attorneys on both sides -- and lawyers with experience in similar cases -- say special prosecutor Mark Ober, the Hillsborough County state attorney assigned the case, faces his most difficult case in an inhospitable climate.

The likelihood of conviction, some observers say, may be dim in this close-knit, God-fearing, law-and-order community where residents are more likely to speak with a drawl than an accent.

''That prosecutor has one heck of a job on his hands,'' said Miami lawyer Edward Carhart, a former chief Miami-Dade prosecutor who defended a police officer charged with covering up the death of Miami motorcyclist Arthur McDuffie. ``If he has to try these people in the Panhandle, I give the odds as 10-1 against him.''

''I don't envy the prosecutor,'' Carhart added.

CHARGES FILED

On Tuesday, Ober charged the seven guards and nurse, Kristin Schmidt, with aggravated manslaughter of a child, a charge that carries a maximum sentence of 30 years.

The charges say the eight failed to provide Martin ``the care, supervision or services necessary to maintain his physical or mental health that a prudent person would consider essential.''

In a short statement, Ober told reporters the charges were meant to show that ``this conduct cannot and will not be tolerated in our society and none of us are above the law.''

If the charges resemble anything in recent history, it is the January 2004 indictment of two nurses in the death of 17-year-old Omar Paisley, an Opa-locka youth who died at the Miami juvenile lockup of a ruptured appendix after begging with officials for three days for medical attention.

''The grand jury heard all of the testimony and they felt that the failure to act in this case shifted the incident from a terrible tragedy to a horrible crime,'' said Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, Miami-Dade's top prosecutor.

''These cases take a great deal of tenacity and determination to find ways in which to apply the law and hold everyone responsible,'' Rundle added. ``That is what you hope for in these cases.''

RACIAL OVERTONES

As in the Paisley case, the death of Martin Anderson touched a raw nerve among African Americans, many of whom feel their children are treated differently by a tough juvenile justice system that entangles far more black children than white. While minority children make up 46 percent of Florida's youth population, they represent 62 percent of the youth held in detention, state records show.

Crump, the family's attorney, said the parents have endured harassment, threats and racial slurs in their fight to bring justice to their son. Crump said his office has received profanity-laced letters aimed at intimidating the family into quitting.

''It begs the question: Did Martin Lee Anderson's life have any value to it?'' Crump said.

Attorneys for the seven guards insist such sentiments are misguided: two of the guards, Sgt. Henry Dickens, 60, and Henry McFadden, Jr., 33, are black, and a third, Sgt. Maj. Raymond Hauck, 48, is Korean.

They acknowledge, however, that such sentiments surely exist.

''It's a racial tidal wave, the racial overtones are so heavy in this case,'' said Panama City attorney Jim White, who represents Hauck.

UNIQUE CHALLENGES

Trials involving law enforcement officers -- some of the boot camp guards were civilian ''drill instructors,'' but they were employed by the Bay County Sheriff's Office -- present unique challenges for prosecutors.

And the challenges can be magnified in a conservative community such as Panama City.

''It is always difficult to prosecute law enforcement personnel, particularly if the victim, as in this case, has a criminal history,'' said Steven Chaykin, a former South Florida federal prosecutor who has been a criminal defense attorney for 20 years.

``Juries are always inclined in favor of law enforcement personnel in any situation like that.''

And the dynamic creates a kind of role reversal between prosecutors and defense attorneys as they seek to seat a perfect jury.

Typically, prosecutors seek religious, conservative jurors who are likely to be trusting of police, while defense attorneys favor jurors who are skeptical, whose respect for law enforcement may be less rigid. But not in a case where the defendant is in law enforcement.

''I'm looking for the little old lady who goes to the bridge club every week who holds law enforcement up on a pedestal, who respects the heck out of law enforcement,'' said Waylon Graham, who represents boot camp Lt. Charles Helms. ``She believes anything a police officer says is gospel.

``Normally, I will run away from that old lady at trial. But in this case, I'm going to hug that little old lady and want her there.''

MAVERICK LAWYERS

Prosecutors, on the other hand, will want ''the mavericks, the type of people you would normally excuse in a heartbeat as a prosecutor,'' Carhart said.

The charges themselves, some attorneys say, will make for a difficult prosecution.

In most cases in which police officers or prison guards are accused of killing an inmate or suspect, juries look to prosecutors to prove that the defendants committed an act that led to a death.

But in the Bay County case, Ober has charged the guards and nurse with failing to take action, said attorney Jonathan Dingus, who represents McFadden.

''They are not charging a crime of commission but a crime of omission -- that they failed to do something they all should have supposedly done,'' he said.

``That's going to be difficult for them to prove.''

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008