COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Boot Camp Medical Examiner Appeals Removal

August 17, 2007


At their meeting on Wednesday, the Florida Medical Examiners Commission reviewed the petition filed by District 14 medical examiner Dr. Charles Siebert appealing their June determination to remove him from his post in Bay County and five other Panhandle Counties and a probable cause panel’s decision that he had violated state law.

The removal vote by MEC, the result of Siebert’s handling of the autopsy in the death of 14-year-old Martin Lee Anderson at a boot camp in Panama City, had come a month after the MEC had voted not to recommend that Siebert’s appointment be renewed when it expired on June 30.

Siebert was formally served with the removal order on July 10 and filed his petition for a formal administrative hearing on July 24. No date has been set for the hearing. Siebert has denied the allegations against him and said he conducted a proper autopsy.

Efforts are underway to find a new medical examiner for the Fourteenth District. State Attorney Steve Meadows appointed Siebert to serve as the interim ME on June 19.

Siebert had made a determination that Anderson had died of complications from sickle cell trait which had not been previously diagnosed.

 

However, a second autopsy performed by Hillsborough medical examiner Vernard Adams following an exhumation indicated that the teen didn’t die from natural causes but rather as the result of suffocation at the hands of the boot camp guards when ammonia capsules were shoved up his nose.

Anderson’s family had refused to accept Siebert’s findings and charged that a cover up existed in the boy’s death after they viewed a videotape of the boot camp incident. Siebert continues to stand by his original determination.

The Florida Legislature approved and Crist signed a $5 million settlement for the Anderson family.

Seven guards and a nurse employed at the camp face manslaughter charges.

Last August, by a 4-1 vote, the commission had recommended that Siebert be placed on supervised probation for the 10 months remaining on his contract with the county. Siebert, who earns approximately $180,000 a year, has had to pay for someone to oversee his work since that time.

Last year, after then Attorney General Charlie Crist asked the commission to investigate autopsies conducted by Siebert that may have contained “fundamental flaws”, a three member probable cause panel of the commission ruled that Siebert had been negligent in performing at least 35 of the nearly 700 autopsies reviewed, finding that Siebert “failed to perform the duties required of a medical examiner”. Siebert has maintained that any errors that he committed were only minor and weren’t intentional. At last month’s commission meeting, the panel reviewed the events which had led up to Siebert’s suspension.

The MEC filed a four count administrative complaint against Siebert on July 10, seeking his immediate removal from office, saying that he had lied about the work performed in the Anderson autopsy. The committee found that Siebert had made material misrepresentations in the Anderson autopsy regarding the thyroid gland and adrenal glands and levied negligence allegations against Siebert in regard to his examination of the groin area and subcutaneous hemorrhages on the thighs and right forearm of Anderson.

Siebert says he did remove and inspect thyroid gland and adrenal glands and found nothing remarkable. He says in regard to his examination of the groin area, he exercised is professional discretion to not dissect the prostate gland and testes because dissection was not necessary to allow him to establish a cause of death.

He argues that he didn’t flay Anderson’s skin because it was evidence from the video that bruising would be existent in those areas but not responsible for the cause of death and to limit damage to Anderson’s body pending his funeral.

 

Isabelle Zehnder   

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008