It took
only 90 minutes today for a jury in
Panama City, Fla.,
to decide
that the juvenile boot-camp
instructors who beat, kicked and kneed a
14-year-old boy, Martin Lee Anderson,
were not guilty of killing him. A nurse
at the camp was acquitted as well.
Press
reports
have noted
that the jury was all white and the boy
was black, and suggested that there was
a racial element to the decision. (Some
of the defendants were white, some
black, and one was Asian.)
There
was also conflicting medical testimony
presented at the trial, with some
witnesses saying that sickle-cell
disorder — and not the actions of the
guards and the nurse, which were seen in
court
in surveillance
videotape
from the camp — was the main
reason the boy collapsed and died.
Even
so, the jury’s decision fit with a
longstanding pattern: When a youth who
has been sent to one of these programs
dies or is badly abused, the odds are
that no one will be held responsible.
Just
this week, a federal government report
came to that
conclusion after studying
hundreds of complaints of abuse,
torture, horrific conditions and deaths
at juvenile boot camps, as Diana Jean
Schemo wrote in The New York Times on
Thursday:
The
report, by the Government
Accountability Office, the
investigative arm of Congress,
examined the cases of 10 teenagers
who died while at programs in six
states, finding “significant
evidence of ineffective management”
and “reckless or negligent operating
practices.” The report detailed
evidence that teenagers were
starved, forced to eat their own
vomit, and to wallow for hours in
their own excrement.
In
one instance, a boy was so
dehydrated that he ate dirt to
survive, according to witnesses and
an autopsy.
Investigators also found that owners
and employees were seldom sent to
prison, even when teenagers died in
their care. Five of these programs
are still in operation, some under
new names or in other states.
The
G.A.O. report, which refers to the boot
camps as “residential treatment
programs” for “troubled youth,” is
posted in its entirety
here (pdf)
and summarized
here (html).
As Ms.
Schemo reported, the boot-camp industry
has insisted for years that accusations
of mistreatment and worse are, in the
words of a trade group, “the noisy
complaints of a few individuals.” (The
trade group doesn’t call them boot
camps, either, at least in its name: the
National
Association of Therapeutic Schools and
Programs.)
The
noise has sometimes made a difference.
When past incidents, like
the death
of 16-year-old Aaron Bacon in Escalante,
Utah, in 1994, broke into public view,
some states moved to shut down the worst
operators, step up oversight of the camp
programs and improve conditions in them,
and the Anderson case has
spurred such an
effort in Florida. But in
other states, the camps remain
completely unregulated, and critics say
it is only a matter of time before the
next Aaron Bacon or Martin Lee Anderson
hits the headlines.