COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Defense objects to more charges : Selection of jurors in Martin Lee Anderson boot camp death case will begin Sept. 24

August 31, 2007
By David Angier


PANAMA CITY - Tampa Assistant State Attorney Mike Sinacore told a Panama City judge Thursday that he would file a second count against eight former boot camp employees if the judge didn’t approve a lesser charge than manslaughter for jurors to consider during trial.

Sinacore is prosecuting seven former drill instructors and a camp nurse on a charge of aggravated manslaughter of a child in the death of Martin Lee Anderson, 14, on Jan. 6, 2006.

Selection of the jury is scheduled for the week of Sept. 24, with trial beginning Oct. 3. The eight face up to 30 years in prison each if convicted as charged.

Sinacore asked Circuit Judge Michael Overstreet on Thursday for an offense of child neglect to be included on the verdict form for jurors to consider if they feel the main charge isn’t proved.

Defense attorney Walter Smith objected, saying it is a homicide case and any lesser charge had to convict the guards of Anderson’s death. The defense wants two options for jurors: the main charge or not guilty.

Overstreet decided to take time to consider his ruling, and Sinacore asked him to rule well before the start of trial. Sinacore said if the judge is going to exclude child neglect as a lesser charge, then he would charge the eight with the crime as a second count so jurors still would have it as an option. What’s out

The sides also went through numerous items Thursday that will be included and excluded as evidence.

For example, the defense was restricted from discussing Anderson’s “bad character,” including evidence that he was involved in gangs, drugs or sexual activity, his school discipline problems or threats of violence he might have made — unless these subjects were discussed in a guard briefing when Anderson was admitted to the juvenile detention facility. If the guards were aware of these issues and they contributed to their handling of Anderson, then it might be admissible.

The judge said he would rule on these issues as they arise in trial.

Overstreet also restricted evidence that Anderson’s mother asked for her son to be placed in the boot camp and circumstantial evidence as to her knowledge of his having sickle cell trait. In the first autopsy, the medical examiner ruled that Anderson died from sickle cell trait, but a second medical examiner, in a subsequent autopsy, ruled the guards suffocated him.

Anderson was diagnosed with sickle cell trait as a baby, but his mother, Gina Jones, said in a recent deposition that she didn’t know of the diagnosis. Sickle cell is a condition that would have kept Anderson from being admitted to the boot camp.

Defense attorney Jim White argued Thursday that he should be able to show that Jones knew or should have known that her son had sickle cell trait and might have lied to boot camp authorities about the condition so they would take him into the camp.

Overstreet said it was irrelevant to the case. The judge is considering whether to allow an instruction to jurors that would say the guards can’t be excused from criminal culpability because Anderson had a condition that they were unaware of that led to his death.

A pre-existing physical condition can’t be used as a defense in a homicide case. For example, if a store clerk has a heart condition and dies of a heart attack during a robbery, the robber can be charged with murder.

White said the defense’s argument would be that Anderson’s death was “totally unforeseeable.”

What’s in

The judge will allow testimony about a lawsuit against the state and county relating to Anderson’s death that resulted in a $7.4 million settlement.

Additionally, defense attorneys might be allowed to ask the second medical examiner, Dr. Vernard Adams of Tampa, about issues of bias that might have come into play in his opinion.

Defense attorney Waylon Graham asked Adams during his deposition if he felt pressured into giving a differing opinion about the cause of Anderson’s death because of the outcry over the first autopsy opinion. Adams said he didn’t want to be criticized, but he didn’t say there was any direct pressure to form a different opinion.

Any discussions between Adams and Ober about pressure being brought by then-Gov. Jeb Bush might be excluded unless Graham can prove the discussion wasn’t protected by attorney confidentiality.

Both sides said they wouldn’t call experts to talk about use-of-force issues.

Jury selection

The case is coming down to the conflicting causes of Anderson’s death and whether the guards were criminally negligent through their use of ammonia capsules on him, or by not getting him medical attention fast enough.

Overstreet told the lawyers that jury selection would be a weeklong process, with 1,450 people summoned in an effort to get six deliberating jurors and three or four alternates. Because of the numbers, jury selection will be at the Marina Civic Center.

The trial will be at the new Juvenile Justice Courthouse on 11th Street.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009