COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Families claim fraud in Ivy Ridge lawsuit

$100M ACCUSATION: State diplomas unavailable despite ads

By CHRIS GARIFO

TIMES ALBANY CORRESPONDENT

Friday, July 28, 2006

ALBANY — A $100-million federal lawsuit has been filed against the Academy at Ivy Ridge by former students and their parents who say they were duped into believing the school was licensed to award New York high school diplomas.

The lawsuit on behalf of 26 former students and parents was filed late Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York.

In addition to the Academy at Ivy Ridge and its corporate entities, defendants named in the lawsuit include Jason G. Finlinson, Ivy Ridge's co-owner and executive director; Joseph and Alyn Mitchell, who are partners with Mr. Finlinson in owning Ivy Ridge; Robert B. Lichfield, who owns the former Mater Dei College property where Ivy Ridge is located; the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASPS), a Utah-based company that includes Ivy Ridge among its affiliated schools; the Northwest Association of Accredited Schools in Boise, Idaho; and several companies that provided marketing services for Ivy Ridge.

Christopher G. Todd, an attorney with Hancock & Estabrook, the Syracuse law firm hired by the plaintiffs, contends the case could represent the biggest example of fraud perpetrated by a private school against its students and their parents.

"Comparisonwise, I've never seen anything like it in our research that comes up to the institution in this action," Mr. Todd said.

Though 26 plaintiffs are listed, the class potentially could include 226 people, Mr. Todd said. Many of the plaintiffs are from New York but others are from California, Connecticut, Massachusetts and South Carolina.

Mr. Finlinson, who has not seen the lawsuit, said that he and Ivy Ridge had been the subject of allegations before.

"It's not true," he said. "It's just people trying to make a little money."

The filing will not affect another lawsuit being prepared for state court by a New Jersey attorney who is representing several former Ivy Ridge students and their families, said the attorney in that action, Joseph S. Murphy.

"I don't want to put down these guys' efforts, I hope they succeed, but class-action lawsuits are always difficult, especially when you've got a deep-pocket defendant and they are certainly that," Mr. Murphy said.

The federal court case likely will have little or no effect on his suit, Mr. Murphy said.

"We're not just suing for monetary damages related to fraud like they allege in this particular complaint," he said. "We're suing for physical injuries to students who attended the academy."

The lawsuit likely will be filed within the next 30 days or so, Mr. Murphy said.

The federal lawsuit points to an agreement reached nearly a year ago between Ivy Ridge and New York Attorney General Eliot L. Spitzer under which the school paid nearly $1.5 million in refunds and fines for fraudulently advertising that it was fully accredited and for issuing high school diplomas when it did not have authority from the state to do so.

Some 113 students had received diplomas prior to the ruling. Under terms of the agreement, those students, or their parents, received refunds of 15 percent of the total tuition paid to Ivy Ridge.

Tuition averages $50,000 per year with the typical student spending 18 months at the school. The school has 210 students, according to Mr. Finlinson.

Ivy Ridge, located on Route 37 just outside of Ogdensburg, also agreed to stop advertising that it was accredited with the Northwest Association of Accredited Schools. The school also was to stop issuing diplomas.

However, according to the lawsuit, Internet sites used by WWASPS and "other Ivy Ridge-affiliated entities" as of Dec. 13 continued to advertise that the school issued either a "central diploma" or a "college-prep diploma." Such claims violated the Assurance of Discontinuance that Mr. Finlinson signed in settling the case with the attorney general's office.

Despite the agreement specifically referring to Ivy Ridge's educational qualifications and business practices as fraudulent and illegal, Mr. Finlinson continues to say that he and the school did nothing wrong.

"We made mistakes and corrected the mistakes. It had nothing to do with fraud or anything," he said Thursday.

The lawsuit accuses Mr. Finlinson, when confronted by parents asking about the agreement with the attorney general, of telling them that Ivy Ridge's "accreditation status was merely 'on hold' and/or that there was a minor 'error in the paperwork' despite the fact that it had never been licensed or accredited."

The suit accuses the defendants of violating the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by perpetrating a scheme to defraud parents out of $2,900 to $4,000 a month in tuition payments.

The plaintiffs allege that the Northwest Association of Accredited Schools participated in the scheme by allowing Ivy Ridge to claim it was accredited through the organization even though the school did not meet minimum criteria. They also contend the organization falsely said high school credits awarded by Ivy Ridge could be transferred to other affiliated high schools or colleges.

Mr. Finlinson predicted his school, which bills itself as a behavioral modification center for troubled teens, would win the case if it comes to trial.

"I'm pretty confident they will find no wrongdoing and we'll come out on top," he said.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010