COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Mother Sues Institution And Hospital Over Matthew Goodman's Death

By Dave Reynolds, Inclusion Daily Express

October 24, 2003

 

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA--Janice Roach filed suit Thursday against the New Jersey institution that housed her 14-year-old son, Matthew Goodman, along with the hospital where he died in February 2002.

 

Matthew, who had autism, was a resident at The Lindens, an institution for 60 youths with developmental disabilities run by Bancroft Neurohealth Inc. of Haddonfield, New Jersey. He died at Children's Hospital in Philadelphia on February 6 of aspiration pneumonia, acute respiratory distress and a blood infection, two days after the hospital had discharged him.

 

Roach claimed that the excessive use of restraints and heavy medication at Lindens weakened her son's immune system. She pointed to evidence that Matthew was placed in restraints for hours at a time -- sometimes overnight -- along with a medical report that showed the teen lost 23 pounds in the final six days of his life.

 

"He was put into what I'd call a prison-type setting . . . bound, overmedicated, allowed to lay on the floor in a semi-comatose state, never allowed outside, never allowed to socialize or to dress or feed himself, to the point where he didn't have much humanity left in him," Roach's lawyer, Slade McLaughlin, told the Star-Ledger Thursday.

 

The suit said that Matthew showed signs of pneumonia during a visit to the hospital on February 4, but that hospital staff discharged him anyway. On the morning of February 5, Bancroft staffers called Roach to tell her they could not detect Matthew's vital signs, the lawsuit said. Instead of calling an ambulance, staffers drove him back to the hospital.

 

The New Jersey Division of Developmental Disabilities concluded earlier this year that Bancroft Neurohealth improperly restrained Matthew and on several occasions left him unattended. The state's Division of Youth and Family Services, however, concluded that Matthew was not medically neglected, nor did his treatment at Lindens cause his death.

 

Roach, other parents, and advocates have been advocating for "Matthew's Law" a measure that would ban the use of restraints except in emergency situations for people with disabilities in private and public facilities. Such a law was proposed in January of this year, but lawmakers substituted the language for more lenient guidelines. Roach refused to give lawmakers permission to name the watered-down version after her son.

 

 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010