COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Families File Complaints Against Coroner In Boot Camp Case

May 25, 2006

Several families filed formal complaints Thursday against Dr. Charles Siebert, the Bay County medical examiner under fire following the smothering death of boot camp inmate Martin Lee Anderson.

Siebert originally ruled the teen died of natural causes. An independent autopsy found the boy had been smothered by guards at the Bay County boot camp.

Michaela Mahoney said Siebert concluded her son was a suicide victim. She believes he was actually shot by a drunk off-duty cop, and Siebert helped cover it up.

"I think he probably just goes along with whatever law enforcement wants," Mahoney said.

The families all expressed support for the parents of Anderson. They said Siebert makes a practice of siding with police over the truth.

The Anderson case brought back angry memories for John Nieson.

Siebert had reviewed his brother's case from the 1970s and concluded Michael Neison died in a car crash. But the family said evidence pointed to a police beating.

Nieson said he doesn't want Martin Anderson’s parents to go through his pain.

"Don’t make them wait 29 years to get justice. Me and my mom are still waiting," he said.

Mary Terry lost her husband and daughter in a tornado. Siebert did both autopsies, which were littered with mistakes.

"Either he don’t know what he’s doing at all, or there was no autopsy performed, and it causes me and my daughter’s only child to have nightmares," she said.

Siebert stands by his findings in the Anderson case. Now he'll have to justify them to the county Medical Examiner's Board.

Siebert issued the following statement in response to Thursday's formal complaints:

"Filing baseless complaints against me is completely unwarranted. As I have explained numerous times, I am an impartial medical professional who issues unbiased conclusions based on medical and forensic evidence of the case. My medical opinion may not be popular, but it is my job to issue conclusions rooted in scientific fact."

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008