COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Competing Theories Explain Teen's Restraint-Related Death

By Jonathan Osborne

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Sunday, May 18, 2003

Dallas attorney Charles Moody holds a basketball
and a portrait of his son Chase Moody. Chase died
at a wilderness camp last October after being restrained
(more pictures below)


On the morning of Oct. 15, Travis County's deputy medical examiner Dr. Elizabeth Peacock performed Chase Moody's autopsy on contract for the justice of the peace in Mason County.

Because the incident occurred outside her jurisdiction, Peacock by law could not rule on the manner of death — natural, homicide, suicide, etc. — only the cause.

Her opinion: Chase essentially choked on the contents of his stomach as his airways were being forcefully blocked by pressure placed on his torso, a cause of death clinically referred to as traumatic asphyxiation.

The Brown Schools, the wilderness camp's owners, disputes that pressure was ever placed on Chase's back, as was suggested by the state's report and the autopsy.

The company hired its own expert — Bexar County Chief Medical Examiner Vincent DiMaio — to review Peacock's work. DiMaio, who reviewed Peacock's autopsy report but never examined the body, opined: "Traumatic asphyxia has become a catch-all cause of death in a broad range of cases. In this particular case, the highly excited state of the young man caused a major cardiac arrhythmia, and it was the subsequent stoppage of the heart that resulted in the involuntary release of the patient's stomach contents. Based on my experience, it's very clear that it was this stoppage of the heart that caused the fatality, and not the asphyxia noted in the report issued by the Travis County Medical Examiner's office."

In other words, DiMaio contends that Chase died of a condition known as excited, or agitated delirium — a condition typically associated with speed or cocaine addicts, not 17-year-old athletes.

But in the world of restraint-related deaths, this disagreement — traumatic asphyxia vs. excited delirium — is not a new or uncommon argument. And in the end, when it comes to restraint-related deaths, it may not matter: Lack of oxygen plays a supporting or starring role in either cause of death.

An April 2002 study by Protection and Advocacy Inc. in California suggests that "sudden death during prone restraint, particularly for those in a state of agitated delirium . . . is not an uncommon phenomenon. The mechanism of death is a sudden fatal cardiac arrhythmia or respiratory arrest due to a combination of factors causing decreased oxygen delivery at a time of increased oxygen demand."

The study, which suggests all forms of prone restraints be banned because of their deadly potential, suggests excited delirium is instead more likely a contributing factor to positional or traumatic asphyxia, where outside pressure or the position of the body interferes with one's ability to breathe.

Mason County Sheriff M. J. Metzger surveys
the spot where 17-year-old Chase Moody died
last year after being restrained by counselors at
the On Track therapeutic wilderness program.


 
The road leading into the Mason Mountain Wildlife
Preserve where Chase Moody died last October after
being restrained by counselors at a Brown Schools
wilderness program called On Track.
 
Chase Moody poses in his football uniform in 1999. Moody died last October after being restrained at a
Mason
County wilderness program run by the Brown Schools.

 
This Jan. 2002 photo of Charles Moody and his son Chase was taken at the family's stable.  


 
Charles Moody and his wife, Tina, leave the
hearing room in the Capitol Annex where he
testified in April about the death of his
son at a wilderness camp near Mason.
 
Chase Moody's stepmother Tina Moody hugs Salvador Sanchez after a state senate hearing on proposed legislation that would regulate restraint methods. Sanchez's 14-year-old niece, Maria Mendoza, died just two days before Chase's death after being placed in a restraint by staff members at Krause Children's Center in Katy.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009