COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Federal Court to Hear Challenges to Deficient Health Care in Michigan Prisons After Prisoner Dies in Restraints
(10/13/2006)

KALAMAZOO, MI- At a hearing tomorrow before U.S. District Court Judge Richard A. Enslen, the American Civil Liberties Union National Prison Project and two Ann Arbor civil rights attorneys will argue that some of the state's oldest and largest prisons do not meet constitutional standards for medical and mental health care, and that Patricia Caruso, Director of the Department of Corrections, should be held in contempt for the Defendants' non-compliance with court orders to improve medical services. 
 
The ACLU is seeking to expand the case of Hadix v. Caruso against several prisons in Jackson, Michigan to include mental health care.  Recently a court-appointed monitor of medical services in the prison system, Robert Cohen, M.D., reported his findings in the August 2006 death of a 21-year-old man who had a long history of mental illness.  Cohen reported that the prisoner died shortly after being released following four days in full restraints, and no physician knew that he was actively psychotic.  No psychiatrist was consulted at any point, according to Cohen.
 
Elizabeth Alexander, director of the ACLU National Prison Project said, "It is critical to explore why and how this man's sentence became a death sentence."   
 
"Mental health care in these prisons must be improved significantly to prevent any more avoidable deaths," added Michael Barnhart, a longtime civil rights attorney. 
 
In tomorrow's arguments, the ACLU and their co-counsel will argue that prison officials should not be allowed to use in-cell mechanical restraints outside of medical settings; that they must require medical and psychiatric evaluations of restrained prisoners, and they must develop protocols for the use of restraints.  Officials must assure that prisoners have access to necessary mental health staff and more closely monitor the needs of prisoners in segregation with mental illnesses.
 
ACLU attorneys will also address concerns about medical services at several Jackson prisons.  They will argue that prison officials should be held in contempt for their non-compliance with several of the court's previous requirements to improve medical services.  These orders have not been followed and further orders protecting prisoners' lives and health are necessary.
 
According to Patricia Streeter, also a longtime civil rights lawyer, "Until the Department of Corrections addresses these deficiencies, prisoners in Jackson will continue to be at risk of unnecessary suffering and death." 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010