COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Group says abused children need their own lawyers

CONCORD, N.H. --When foster parents JoAnn and Kenneth Hamel took in a 2-month old boy who had been neglected, a judge named a non-lawyer volunteer to serve as the baby's Court Appointed Special Advocate.

The volunteer, trained and supported by CASA of New Hampshire, spent countless hours over three years working with the Hamels and a state caseworker to reunify Damien, first with his mother, then with his father.

When his father proved unable to give Damien the care and stability he needed, the state Division of Children, Youth and Families moved to terminate the father's parental rights and clear the way for the Hamels to adopt the boy. Unable to get an appointment with the division's attorney, the Hamels hired their own lawyer to advise them and protect Damien's interests.

They're glad they did. The CASA volunteer "was a true advocate for Damien," but lacked the legal skills to examine witnesses and make her points in court, JoAnn Hamel said. The father was entitled by law to a court-appointed attorney, who was well-prepared compared to the overburdened DCYF lawyer, she said.

"I think there was a risk, without an attorney for Damien, that something could have gone wrong," said Hamel, who believes children need both a CASA and a lawyer. "That hearing could have gone either way."

New Hampshire is one of 19 states that does not guarantee lawyers for the victims in child abuse and neglect cases, but a national group aims to change that.

Children whose futures will be decided in court should have the same right to a lawyer as their accused parents, according to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, which recommended in July that states adopt that guarantee.

Ellen Shemitz, president of the New Hampshire Children's Alliance, agrees.

"You're talking about decisions that will determine the quality, safety and direction of a child's life. There's nothing more fundamental," she said. "A child should be entitled to the same protection of those rights as an adult has."

But some judges and lawyers say CASAs -- who now represent children in about 70 percent of the state's abuse and neglect cases -- can spend far more time getting to know the children, their families and their circumstances.

"I think it is absolutely possible to over-lawyer any case," said Judge Edwin Kelly, head of the state's new Family Division courts. "Because CASAs are so capable of expressing the interests of the child, it's not as though the child's voice is being unheard."

However, Kelly would like to see a state law allowing judges to appoint lawyers for children in cases that are highly complex or hard to prove.

Federal law now requires guardians for all abused and neglected children, but does not say they must be lawyers.

Some states require a lawyer-guardian to represent the child's best interests, whether or not the child agrees with the recommendations. Others require a traditional lawyer-advocate. Still others, like New Hampshire, rely primarily on CASAs, although the state still uses lawyer-guardians when CASAs are not available.

In New Hampshire, the CASA system works well because judges give great weight to their recommendations and testimony, and most child abuse and neglect proceedings are not very adversarial, said Marcia Sink, president and chief executive of CASA of New Hampshire.

"There's more a sense of 'Let's work with this family' and trying to put things back together again whenever possible and be successfully reunited, so we're not always looking at this really intense legal battle," Sink said.

In 2004, the latest year for which complete statistics are available, the state Division of Children, Youth and Families pursued 334 abuse and neglect cases and filed 99 termination of parental rights cases, said spokesman Greg Moore.

CASAs handle only one or two cases at a time and can meet informally with children, parents, teachers and counselors, Sink said. By contrast, even the best lawyer-guardians have higher caseloads and are restricted in how many hours they can spend on each case by reimbursement rules for court-appointed attorneys.

If a case becomes adversarial or complex -- for example, if the child has medical or immigration problems -- the group's staff attorney, David Sandberg, can step in or seek help from several law firms that have volunteered to help, she said.

Sandberg says in some termination cases, it is critical to have a lawyer for the child. But otherwise he prefers CASAs, who are trained to remain open-minded from beginning to end about what is best for the child.

"If you don your litigation armor, you begin to give that up and you begin to shut down," he said. "You're not listening to the evidence with a truly open mind -- you're listening with an eye to what you're going to ask on cross-examination."

Margaret Hallyburton, a former CASA turned lawyer, says the roles of advocates and lawyers are different and that some children can benefit from both.

"As a lay volunteer, you're doing much more hands-on, more chatting with people on a daily basis ... here's what's going on in the life of this child," she said. "As an attorney, you're getting down to what is the decision the judge has to make at this hearing, what is the information the judge needs to make that decision, and let me get that information before the judge."

She thinks the state should consider requiring lawyers for "mature minors" -- pre-teens and teens mature enough to articulate their wishes, Hallyburton said. The opinions of mature minors must be considered by law in other, similar cases, such as custody battles, adoptions and guardianships, she said.

In New Hampshire, judges can -- but are not required to -- appoint a separate lawyer for an older child whose wishes conflict with the guardian's recommendations: for example, a 12-year-old girl who wants to stay with her mother and abusive stepfather, when the CASA recommends foster care.

But the American Bar Association and Lawyers for Children America say children in all abuse, neglect and termination proceedings should have lawyers.

Howard Davidson, director of the American Bar Association's Center on Children and the Law, said lawyers can do things that CASAs cannot, especially when it's important to hold a state agency's feet to the fire.

"Lawyers can help get their kids out of the system faster," he said. "When kids and families aren't getting the services they need, they can file motions and subpoenas to question agency representatives."

Hallyburton doubts New Hampshire will be swayed any time soon.

"I think that there's less reluctance to appoint attorneys for kids than there is the practical limitation on the state's willingness to pay for them," she said.

------

On the Net:

Model law for representation of children in abuse and neglect cases: http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/RARCCDA/2006annualmeeting--approvedtext.htm

Lawyers for Children America: http://www.lawyersforchildrenamerica.org/matriarch/default.asp

ABA national and state reports on child representation: http://www.abanet.org/child/cipcatalog/home.html.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010