An inquest jury looking into the
death of a 14-year-old inmate at the King County Juvenile
Detention Center found Thursday that he died of a natural
medical condition that showed no earlier hint of its existence
before he was stricken.The
jury also determined that the nurse on duty at the center
responded to a call for help from the teen's roommate, and both
she and paramedics made efforts to save the sick boy's life.
The six jurors took about 40
minutes to answer nine questions at the end of the 2 ½-day
inquest, which was called to determine the circumstances
surrounding the Dec. 26 death of Johnny Lim.
Jurors heard testimony from 10
witnesses, who covered numerous issues, including the time it
took detention staff members to respond to Lim's emergency, the
quality of the intercom system his roommate used to call for
aid, the procedures followed and techniques used at the center
during emergencies and the likelihood of survival for people
with Lim's condition.
But the questions the jury was
given — the main purpose of the inquest — were limited in scope.
The answers essentially established the facts surrounding Lim's
death.
After jurors delivered their
findings Thursday, Lim's family and their attorneys — who wanted
a more detailed set of more than 30 questions — expressed
disappointment.
Attorney Ron Ward called the
proceeding an "exercise in futility" heavily weighted in favor
of the King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention.
Ward said Judge Darrell Phillipson tried to provide balance to
the inquest but ultimately the process "should never be confused
with justice" and needs to be reformed.
Inquest findings


The six jurors in the King County inquest
into the death of inmate Johnny Lim were asked to answer a
series of questions. Jurors answered "Yes" unanimously to
all the questions, except for No. 4, to which they all
answered "No." The questions:
1. Was
Johnny Lim in custody at the Youth Service Center on Dec.
26, 2005?
2. Did
Johnny Lim die of a spontaneous brain stem hemorrhage due to
ruptured arteriovenous malformation on Dec. 26, 2005?
3. Is this
cause of death classified as natural?
4. Did
Johnny Lim show any evidence of a medical problem before
Dec. 26, 2005?
5. Did
(Lim's cellmate) push the intercom button at approximately
6:30 a.m. on Dec. 26, 2005?
6. Did the
duty nurse Rene Berg arrive in the room at 6:32 a.m. on Dec.
26, 2005 to examine Johnny Lim?
7. Was
Johnny Lim unresponsive and evidencing no breath sounds or
pulse when nurse Berg arrived in the room at 6:32 a.m.?
8. Did nurse
Berg initiate CPR?
9. Did
Seattle Fire Department paramedic units make efforts to
revive Johnny Lim?
"They were just plain questions,
basically facts that we already knew," said Jennifer Garman, a
friend of the family.
Findings to be weighed
The King County Prosecuting
Attorney's Office will take one to two weeks to examine the
jurors' answers and the other material from the inquest and
decide whether any criminal charges are warranted, standard
practice after an inquest, said spokesman Dan Donohoe.
Lim, who was being held at the
detention center on suspicion of car theft, was found
unconscious and not breathing by facility nurse Rene Berg at
about 6:30 a.m. After CPR and other measures were attempted by
Berg and then paramedics, Lim was transported to Harborview
Medical Center where he was pronounced dead.
The Medical Examiner's Office
ruled Lim's death was due to natural causes, specifically from
spontaneous bleeding to his brain stem due to a congenital
abnormality. Lim's was the first in-custody death at the
14-year-old juvenile detention center in Seattle.
Earlier this week, the jury heard
from detention officers on duty the morning of Lim's death. They
testified that all required bed checks had been made throughout
the night, including one by officer Chima Ijeoma at 6:25, when,
he testified, he saw nothing unusual in Lim's cell.
Wednesday, Lim's 14-year-old
cellmate told jurors that Lim had complained to him on and off
throughout the night of a "killer headache" and that he had
called for help three times and waited 10 minutes before a nurse
came that morning.
The Seattle Times is not naming
the cellmate because he is a juvenile.
Thursday morning the last
witness, nurse Berg, testified that just after 6:30 a.m. she
heard the guard in Lim's unit receive a single intercom call for
help from the cellmate, Berg said.
"The intercom was very scratchy,
there's a lot of static," Berg said. "The young man said
something about a stomachache."
Questions to nurse
Jared Karstetter, a lawyer for
the juvenile-detention guards, asked Berg whether there is a
buzzer or a bell to alert staff members when an inmate is
initiating contact over the intercoms.
"To my knowledge, when they're
working, yes," she said.
Berg said she found Lim on the
floor, unresponsive, but initially couldn't tell who he was
because he wasn't wearing a standard wrist identification band.
She began CPR and just after that a 911 call was placed.
Medical-aid units arrived in five minutes, according to several
witnesses.
During the wait, Berg continued
CPR and ordered Lim's medical chart, which came only after
another youth's chart was mistakenly retrieved, she said.
Nothing in his medical history indicated a congenital defect,
and at first Berg said she suspected a drug overdose.
After delivering their findings
Thursday, members of the jury expressed dismay that the
questions they were given were simplistic, given the complexity
of the testimony.
"We took multiple pages of notes
and only used very little of that," said Erin O'Malley, 21.
Still, he said, he felt like the detention-center staff members
did "what they were supposed to do."
"I don't think there was any
negligence," said juror Jay McCarthy said.
Natalie Singer: 206-464-2704
or
nsinger@seattletimes.com