COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

State education board considers restraints for special ed students

By Gena Terlizzi (Contact)

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Right now in Kansas, there are no statewide guidelines for how teachers and their helpers should handle unruly special education students.

On Tuesday, members of the Disability Rights Center attended the Kansas State Board of Education meeting to hear proposed guidelines for schools to follow when special education students get out of control.

Advocates for the disabled said the mandates are necessary to prevent mistreatment of the students.

Rocky Nichols, executive director of the Disability Rights Center, said during the 2005 legislative session he heard many parents speak about the mistreatment of their children.

“Hundreds and hundreds of parents from around the state came forward, testified and talked about how their kids were secluded and restrained inappropriately,” Nichols said. “We have kids who have been sat on by gym teachers. Their arms have been duct-taped together as a form of restraint. They’ve been rolled up in gym mats. They’ve been placed in little boxes.”

Those are the extreme cases, but members of the Disability Rights Center said they hoped a few guidelines would spell out what is appropriate when it comes to handling special education students with behavior problems.

If a child gets out of control and must be separated from other students, they can be placed in what’s called a seclusion room. The proposal recommends the room be at least 36 square feet.

But board member Carol Rupe expressed concern about the small size. “Thirty-six square feet — that’s about 5-by-7. It’s euphemistic to call it a room. We used to call them time-out boxes,” Rupe said.

Rodney Bieker, who presented the proposal on behalf of the Department of Education, said the committees working on the proposal had to take several factors into account when determining the optimum size for the room.

“If you get a room too big, the child might get a pretty good run in and hurt himself. You get a room too small, and you got a poor little child that’s claustrophobic and can’t even breathe in there,” Bieker said.

Nichols said the proposal was the result of compromise among several groups.

“We’ve had many, many meetings on these with school officials and others. It’s not everything we want. It’s not everything the disability community wants. It’s not everything the public safety community wants. It’s a good compromise, though,” he said.

The proposal also places restrictions on when and how a child can be restrained. Restraint could only be used by trained staff if the child’s actions were putting the child or others in danger.

Supporters of the new guidelines said they hoped the state education board would be prepared to adopt the new policy when it meets in August.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010