COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

No state fully compliant with child-welfare standards

All 50 states have failed to comply fully with federal child-welfare standards designed to protect kids from abuse and neglect, according to reviews since 2002 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Not a single state met a particularly important standard, which says children in foster homes should have "permanency and stability in their living situations." Other common deficiencies: caseworkers not visiting kids often enough, kids failing to receive promised health services and kids suffering abuse or neglect.

States are now undergoing a second round of reviews. Unless they improve, they face fines.

About 523,000 children are in the U.S. foster-care system, 20% of whom are eligible for adoption, according to HHS figures. Nearly 90% are considered "special needs" and eligible for a subsidy because they are disabled, a member of a minority group, older than 8 or the sibling of another child in the system.

A 1997 federal law emphasized permanent placements by requiring officials to decide more quickly whether children should be reunited with biological parents or put up for adoption. That year, 31,000 kids were adopted from foster care. Since 2000, about 50,000 have been adopted each year. States get bonuses for finalizing a high number of adoptions.

Child-welfare experts see many reasons why children fall through the cracks, with some ending up in a secondary private network. "There's a lot of blame to go around," says Victor Groza, an adoption expert and social work professor at Case Western Reserve University. He criticizes both private agencies that arrange international adoptions — for not providing better post-adoption services — and adoptive families — for not preparing better for possible problems.

Kent Markus, director of the National Center for Adoption Law and Policy, says the public has "enormously high expectations" for its child-welfare system but doesn't fund it adequately. He says many large families may do a commendable job, but states may need to track them more closely.

Wade Horn, HHS' assistant secretary for children and families, says states need to do a better job of recruiting potential adoptive families, monitoring homes and providing post-adoption services.

Whatever the problem, those who suffer most are the children.

"The worst thing is to languish in foster care," says Horn, a psychologist. "The more instability in a child's life, the worse the child does. Kids need stability."

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010