COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

After boot camps: If sheriffs can't afford to meet new mandates, troubled teens suffer

A Times Editorial
Published July 4, 2006

The law that was supposed to give juvenile offenders a better chance to turn around their lives has instead reduced the chances, and don't blame Pinellas Sheriff Jim Coats. Coats, faced with new state mandates his department couldn't afford, had little choice but to follow three other sheriffs and close his boot camp.

The result is that one month after Gov. Jeb Bush ceremoniously signed the Martin Lee Anderson Act into law, only one juvenile camp remains in Florida. The law that was intended to shave the rough and dangerous edges off physically brutal boot camps has instead all but eliminated them.

The law was born of good intentions. Anderson, 14, died Jan. 6 after being roughed up by deputies at a boot camp in Bay County. But the new law comes with more oversight and new requirements that weren't fully compensated by the state's increased reimbursement rate, and elected sheriffs can't help but notice the explosive political climate.

Rep. Gus Barreiro, R-Miami Beach, who deserves credit for exposing the mistreatment in Bay County, demonstrated some of that political bluster in his reaction to Coats' decision. "If they don't want to be in the business the way the state thinks they should be," he told a reporter, "then they should find something else to do."

Barreiro's remark is cheap shot. Coats and former Sheriff Everett Rice, now a candidate for attorney general, showed a genuine commitment to boot camps and rehabilitation when other sheriffs did not. Facing a discouraging history of rearrest for juveniles in the program and an unreimbursed $1.3-million increase for this fiscal year, though, Coats reasonably concluded he simply could not afford to continue.

Likewise, Polk Sheriff Grady Judd, who now runs the only remaining juvenile camp in the state, is less than enthusiastic. "There's just so much bureaucratic overlap now," he said. "Making this program work is a tremendous burden."

The failures in the Bay County boot camp were shared ones, between the sheriff who operated it and the state Department of Juvenile Justice that largely looked the other way. If there is to be a new beginning and a new way to turn around the lives of some troubled teenagers, then the solutions must be shared as well.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010