COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

School’s co-founder sentenced

November 20, 2007
By Debbie Bell


Contending to the end he had done nothing wrong, Randall Hinton was sentenced Monday to 25 days jail and one-year probation for his convictions of third-degree assault and false imprisonment against Royal Gorge Academy students.

Deputy District Attorney Thom LeDoux read pre-sentence investigation statements made by Hinton that repeatedly laid the blame for the entire incident at the students’ feet during Monday’s sentencing hearing before Fremont County Court Judge Norman Cooling.

Hinton, 34, was found guilty in August by a six-person jury of one count each of third-degree assault and false imprisonment. He also was found not guilty of four other counts of third-degree assault and one other count of false imprisonment during the week-long hearing.

At the time of his arrest in January, Hinton was project manager and co-founder of the Royal Gorge Academy boarding school.

“To this day, (Hinton) believes he did nothing wrong,” LeDoux said Monday as he explained to Cooling why Hinton should be sentenced to jail. “He still believes he was justified. That is a real problem.”

In the PSI, when Hinton was asked what affect the incident had on his victims, he replied, “I believe they finally realize the importance of their choices and realize if they don't change their ways they will have adults making choices for them.”

Also, Hinton said, “I believe parts of the community have gained from this.”

LeDoux argued Hinton’s attitude did not show proper respect to the court or to the criminal justice process.

However, Hinton’s attorney, Michael Gillick, said Hinton had been consistent with his statements throughout his arrest, trial and aftermath and indicated if Hinton changed his story now, he would be guilty of lying.

“Judge, jail is not an appropriate sentence for Randall Hinton,” Gillick said. “He deserves no jail time.”

Gillick pointed to Hinton’s clean criminal record, strong employment record and responsibility as the sole provider for his family including his wife, Joy, and four young children.

“Randall Hinton has dedicated his life to helping others, primarily helping kids,” Gillick said. “Jail would create an extreme hardship for his family.”

Gillick also indicated Hinton has abandoned his career in helping troubled youth and will begin a management job Friday in Cortez for an automotive company.

Hinton took the opportunity to address the judge directly before sentencing, but was brief in his comments.

“This has been very educational,” Hinton said with a hint of a smile, “and that’s probably about it.” He then returned to his seat.

Cooling acknowledged Hinton had been in the “difficult situation” of dealing with troubled youth on a daily basis, but said the guilty verdicts proved he had crossed the line.

“It is clear to me Mr. Hinton does not believe to this day he did anything wrong,” Cooling said, recognizing he was troubled by Hinton’s refusal to accept appropriate responsibility for his actions.

Cooling asked Hinton to explain several of his comments in the PSI. In that report, Hinton said “the newspaper probably sold more newspapers” because of the notoriety of his trial, and said he did not understand the journalistic value of his trial.

In seeking “balance” in sentencing Hinton, Cooling said he believed some jail sentence was entirely appropriate as he handed down 25 days in county jail and one year probation in the third-degree assault conviction, and $300 fine and one year probation in the false imprisonment conviction. Cooling said probation sentences would run concurrently.

Hinton was ordered to begin his jail sentence at 9 a.m. Jan. 1, 2008. Gillick indicated Hinton was considering his options to file an appeal in the sentencing.

Hinton also will return to court soon for a hearing on court costs. LeDoux said the District Attorney’s office is working to gather information on the costs of prosecution, and will seek an order instructing Hinton to repay those expenses.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010