COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

CAICA NEWS

Report on Lack of Regs for Restraint of Disabled Children

January 13, 2009
By Christina Jewett , ProPublica


A disturbing new report [1] (PDF) issued by the congressionally mandated National Disability Rights Network [2] documents incidents from across the country of a problem that fewer than half of states address: the restraint and seclusion of disabled school children.

The Network's state chapters compiled a list of cases that "should shock you," according to the organization, which was created by federal law to advocate for people with disabilities.

Disabled children in Sumner County, Tenn., were locked in four-by-three foot plywood cells that had been put together by maintenance staff at 12 district schools. An Oklahoma student with autism was led around his school wearing a harness and rope. Since 2002, three children -- including a 7-year-old girl -- have died as a result of being restrained in public and private schools, the report says. Another boy locked in a seclusion cell hanged himself with his makeshift belt.

Are the cases isolated incidents? That’s what the Network's executive director Curtis Decker hopes to find out. The organization is releasing the report during a Capitol Hill press conference today and will be calling on the Obama administration to push for national tracking of instances of restraint and seclusion in schools.

"Our role is to identify this as a serious, growing problem," Decker told ProPublica. "Now it has to be turned over to administrators to get a handle on this."

Disability rights advocates say that since children with disabilities were granted the right to full inclusion in public schools 30 years ago -- a phenomenon often referred to as "mainstreaming" -- disabled children have been the frequent targets of coercive discipline.

While the disability advocacy community succeeded in seeking meaningful legal changes in the use of restraints in mental health facilities, schools are a new frontier.

About 40 percent of states have no law concerning restraint and seclusion in schools. Fewer than half of states ask schools to notify parents when children are restrained or placed in isolation, and 90 percent of states allow face-down restraints.

Even in states where school restraints have been connected to deaths, reform has been slow to come.

In Wisconsin, the disability community was shocked after 7-year-old Angellika Arndt died May 26, 2006, after being held face-down on the floor of the Rice Lake Day Treatment Center. The girl, a foster child diagnosed with emotional disturbance, was restrained after blowing bubbles in her milk and defying time-out rules.

Kristin Kerschensteiner, managing attorney for Disability Rights Wisconsin, authored a report [3] (PDF) concluding the state failed to reduce the use of restraint and seclusion following the girl's death.

"We've been working on this for more than two years now and nothing is happening," Kerschensteiner told [4] the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The state's Department of Health Services, in response, issued a statement to the Sentinel noting that it took strong actions leading to closure of the facility and will continue on a statewide effort to "work with our partners to issue additional guidance on the dangers of the use of seclusion and restraint."

In California, Leslie Morrison, Disability Rights California’s leading investigative attorney, issued a June 2007 report [5] documenting multiple cases of misuse of restraints, including that of a 10-year-old non-verbal boy who was tied to his wheelchair for hours and left on the school van on two separate occasions.

Morrison's group championed legislation that would have mandated that only trained school personnel could restrain children -- and only in instances in which the child's behavior put others at risk of physical harm.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the bill in September, though, noting that it could inhibit school staff from "intervening in an emergency situation and place more students at risk of potential harm."

The national report, however, does document some small victories. Advocates prevailed on behalf of individual students, and the Tennessee school district agreed to dismantle the plywood boxes.

Ultimately, Decker said he's hoping to see more tracking and regulation of the problem and training in "positive behavior supports," a research-based system believed to reduce the need for extreme punishments.

At the very least, he said, he’d like to see a change in the federal IDEA law [6], which outlines how education should be funded for more than six million students with disabilities.

Decker's organization included an excerpt from a March 2008 government letter describing the program’s philosophy: "While IDEA emphasizes the use of positive behavioral interventions… IDEA does not flatly prohibit the use of mechanical restraints or other aversive behavioral techniques for children with disabilities," the letter says.

 

TROUBLED TEENS - TEEN ABUSE - HELP FOR TEENS - GAO - HELP YOUR TEEN - STRUGGLING TEENS
STRUGGLING TEEN - TEEN DATING - ADD ADHD - RESTRAINTS - CHILD ABUSE - PARENTS

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010