COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Stop paddling students
Lawmakers should ban corporal punishment statewide
EDITORIAL: The Charlotte Observer, January 4, 2007

 

It's time to retire the paddle in North Carolina. N.C. lawmakers should follow Union County's lead Tuesday and ban corporal punishment statewide.

In 2007, it is ridiculous to even be having a debate over whether educators should be allowed to hit students as punishment. But in a few counties in North Carolina, and some states -- primarily in the South -- this antiquated and largely ineffective discipline tool is still around.

In Union County, school board members have spent an inordinate amount of time haggling over it. Tuesday's 6-3 vote to ban it was welcome. But it came only after school board members, parents and educators had jostled over the issue for years. Previous boards couldn't reach a consensus, so the superintendent had established an agreement with principals not to use the punishment. With new school board members and a new superintendent the issue was bound to come up again, and it did with Tuesday's vote.

But this matter should not be left up to the politics of individual counties -- from school board election to election, superintendent to superintendent. The state should settle the matter. Lawmakers should say "no" to corporal punishment.

Current N.C. law has specific guidelines on using corporal punishment if counties choose it. It can not be administered in the classroom when other students are present. Only principals, teachers and certain others can administer it. Students must be informed beforehand what conduct will result in corporal punishment.

But these rules can't mitigate the basic problems. Research shows paddling can and often does result in injuries to students. Data also show it is disproportionately used on poor children, minorities, students with disabilities and boys. And educators attest that as a deterrent to bad behavior, paddling doesn't work. The same children are punished over and over. Schools using it often have poorer academic achievement, more truancy, more vandalism and higher dropout rates.

As important, corporal punishment sends exactly the wrong message to students -- that violence is an acceptable response to conflict.

Industrialized countries worldwide have prohibited corporal punishment in public schools for more than a century. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools banned it more than a decade ago. It's time for arguments over it in other school systems in this state to cease. North Carolina should ban corporal punishment statewide.

An e-mail to Peggy Dean* that speaks for many
January 3, 2007

Peggy:

We've never met, but I've read about your efforts and heard you speak at the meeting Tuesday night.

I wanted to thank you. We just recently moved to the area, but the ban on corporal punishment makes me feel a bit better about our decision. Your hard work made this all possible.

With gratitude,
P. M.
Waxhaw, NC


* Peggy Dean, RN is a member of the Board of Directors of PTAVE

Anna sends a message

The star of the Union County Board of Education meeting, January 2, 2007, was 6-year-old Anna Majni, shown here holding a school "paddle," with her mother, Jamie.

 

Anna demonstrated to the Union County educators the true meaning of corporal punishment: an adult weighing many times Anna's 39 lbs., using a board that is almost as large as Anna as a weapon with which to beat a child. They voted wisely.


Anna and her mother have approved the use of these photos


Look at the size of that paddle vs. the size of little Anna!

SEE RELATED:

http://www.nospank.net/nc-01.htm

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009